Skip to content
1,000+ sources 13 -stage pipeline 70+ expert perspectives 100% source-linked

Run due diligence before you fall in love with the deal.

Your pitch deck. Our evidence pipeline.

Upload a deck. Receive structured, source-backed verification across your diligence framework - in hours, not weeks. When the story doesn't match the public record, you see both versions with source links.

We automate the evidence pipeline, not the judgment.

Expedite Capital · Unfold VC · WaVe-X (Walter Group CVC) · Kogito Ventures
1

Upload your pitch deck

Submit your pitch deck or investment memo. Processing begins immediately.

2

Define your scope

Full DD, financials only, team & founders, market & competition.

3

Receive your IC-ready report

Typically 4-6 hours (full DD), under 2 hours (focused scope).

Used by VC funds. Backed by investors who tested the product before writing the check.

  • Output rated 10x better than human analysts
  • 2 material conflicts surfaced across 3 deals
  • 1 deal moved to extended DD based on findings

WaVe-X

Partner

"10x better than the analyst."

The output quality gave the team a faster starting point for evaluating claims across the deck.

Kogito Ventures

General Partner

"It opens your eyes to certain risks and issues that probably no one had noticed before."

Two material conflicts were surfaced early enough to change how the fund approached diligence.

Expedite Capital · Unfold VC · WaVe-X (Walter Group CVC) · Kogito Ventures
View Sample Report

Or upload a pitch deck to start your verification

See what a verification report surfaces.

Real findings from a real verification. Conflicts, adversarial review, risk playbooks, and IC-ready questions — all source-linked.

TEAM & ORGANISATION

High Confidence
ClaudeGeminiGPT
3

Northstar's CTO joined from a staff engineer role at a mid-stage SaaS company and has not previously managed a team larger than four. The current engineering org is twelve people across three squads with plans to double by Q3. LinkedIn and reference calls confirm strong individual contribution but no evidence of scaled hiring, architecture review ownership, or incident-management leadership.

MARKET & COMPETITION

High Confidence
ClaudeGeminiGPT
3

FinLedger, the closest competitor, closed a $40M Series B in November 2025 and announced SMB lending vertical expansion in their press release — directly overlapping with Northstar's core market. FinLedger has 3x the engineering team and existing bank partnerships that took 18 months to build.

PRODUCT & TECHNOLOGY

CONFLICTING INFORMATION

RISK ASSESSMENT

QUESTIONS FOR FOUNDERS

Medium Confidence
ClaudeGeminiGPT
3

Northstar reports strong logo retention, but product analytics show a median of roughly two monthly active users per customer organization. That is consistent with bookkeeping-only adoption in micro-SMBs and raises a founder question: is usage intentionally narrow, or is multi-seat expansion failing in the accounts that underpin the Series A story?

View Sample Report

Or upload a pitch deck to start your verification

Can't I just paste a deck into Claude?

You can prompt Claude to analyze a pitch deck. Here's what it can't do:

1

Retrieve and cross-check sources

Claude works with what you paste in. We pull actual filings from PACER, SEC EDGAR, state registries, and USPTO, score each by authority, recency, and independence, and show you all versions with confidence ratings when sources contradict the deck.

2

Process at scale

A single verification burns ~100 million tokens across 1,000+ sources, 13 pipeline stages, and 70+ analysis agents simultaneously. Claude's context window is ~200K tokens, a 500x gap.

3

Produce consistent results

Different prompts, different output. We run the same pipeline every time, same checks, same adversarial review, same methodology. Then you drill into any finding and go deeper from inside the platform.

Your criteria define what to verify, what counts as a risk, which sources matter, when to flag. Same engine, different outputs. The IP is yours.

IC-ready output. Not a summary — a cited evidence package.

Every verification produces a structured, citation-backed report designed for your IC workflow. Share with co-investors, export to your firm's format, or use directly in partner meetings.

Report

Interactive Evidence Package

Browse findings by domain, expand any insight, drill into source evidence. Every claim linked to its origin document.

Report sections

Executive Brief Conflicts Risk Playbooks Opportunities Questions Deep Dive Sources Index
Chat

Chat with Findings

Ask questions about any finding. Source-backed answers grounded in the evidence.

Evidence

Source-Linked

Every claim cited. Quotes, URLs, and confidence scores. One-click verification.

Audio

Audio Briefing

Listen on your commute

Export

PDF · JSON · CSV

Share with co-investors

The math behind moving DD before the term sheet.

Time per company

Manual Process

8-60+ hours

With Research.Tech

4-6 hours (full DD) + analyst review

Coverage

Manual Process

Selective deep dives on 25-30/year

With Research.Tech

Structured verification across your full pipeline

Source traceability

Manual Process

Trust the analyst's memory

With Research.Tech

Every field linked to its origin document

IC readiness

Manual Process

Analyst rewrites notes into memo

With Research.Tech

Gating checklist: specific items to verify before proceeding

Output

Manual Process

Unstructured notes

With Research.Tech

Structured evidence package with citations

Every finding traces to a source. Every source is scored.

Your Input

Pitch Deck

Claims & projections

Scope

Full DD or focused

Framework

Your diligence criteria

Priorities

What matters most

Input

Verification Engine — 5 phases · 13 stages · 3 review cycles

Extraction

Research

Analysis

Adversarial Review

Assembly

0+

Agents

Multi-model cross-check

Claude
GPT
Gemini
Grok

0+

Sources

100M+

Tokens per run

Output

IC-Ready Evidence Package

Conflicts

Both sides, source-linked

Risk Playbooks

Assessment + mitigation

Gating Checklist

Items to verify pre-term sheet

Full Deep Dive

10 categories, all cited

Covers entities across all 50 US states + 8 international registries. Coverage depth varies by jurisdiction — gaps are explicitly flagged in the report.

Trace how every finding was built. Every source, every step.

Follow any claim back to its origin: from the research task, through every search and fetched page, down to exact text snippets and saved sources. Click any node to trace the full chain.

Loading graph data…

Your pipeline is growing. Your diligence capacity is not.

See the output first.

Browse a completed verification on a real (anonymized) company — Executive Brief, Conflict Log, Source Chains, and linked sources.

View Sample Report

Test it on a closed deal.

Upload a deck where you already know the answer. See if we find what your team found — and what they missed.

Upload a Pitch Deck

Create an account to track your reports.