Partner
"10x better than the analyst."
Increased review capacity with consistent, repeatable report format across weekly deal flow.
Run due diligence before you fall in love with the deal.
Upload a pitch deck. Get IC-ready evidence in hours.
- Revenue, team, IP, market, regulatory — every dimension verified
- 1,000+ public and industry sources cross-checked
- Conflicts flagged. Omissions surfaced. IC questions generated.
No signup. No sales call. 2-minute read.
Encrypted processing. No model training on your data. Full deletion on request.
Used on real deals, with real downside.
- Output rated 10x better than human analysts
- 2 material conflicts surfaced across 3 deals
- 1 deal moved to extended DD based on findings
General Partner
"It opens your eyes to certain risks and issues that probably no one had noticed before."
Two material conflicts were surfaced early enough to change how the fund approached diligence.
50% of early customers invested their personal capital in Research.Tech after using the product on a deal.
Built by a team from adversarial security research, institutional finance, and enterprise AI.
Here's what a verification report surfaces.
Real findings from a real verification. Conflicts, adversarial review, risk playbooks, and IC-ready questions — all source-linked.
TEAM & ORGANISATION
High Confidence3
Northstar's CTO joined from a staff engineer role at a mid-stage SaaS company and has not previously managed a team larger than four. The current engineering org is twelve people across three squads with plans to double by Q3. LinkedIn and reference calls confirm strong individual contribution but no evidence of scaled hiring, architecture review ownership, or incident-management leadership.
MARKET & COMPETITION
High Confidence3
FinLedger, the closest competitor, closed a $40M Series B in November 2025 and announced SMB lending vertical expansion in their press release — directly overlapping with Northstar's core market. FinLedger has 3x the engineering team and existing bank partnerships that took 18 months to build.
PRODUCT & TECHNOLOGY
CONFLICTING INFORMATION
RISK ASSESSMENT
QUESTIONS FOR FOUNDERS
Medium Confidence3
Northstar reports strong logo retention, but product analytics show a median of roughly two monthly active users per customer organization. That is consistent with bookkeeping-only adoption in micro-SMBs and raises a founder question: is usage intentionally narrow, or is multi-seat expansion failing in the accounts that underpin the Series A story?
The trust architecture that makes this IC-ready
Every finding comes with the evidence to defend it in a partner meeting.
1
Source Confidence Scoring
Each finding rated High / Medium / Low based on source quality. You know what to trust at a glance.
2
Cell-Level Provenance
Every claim traceable to the exact source, page, and timestamp. Verify any finding in under 30 seconds.
3
No Hallucinated Conclusions
When evidence is ambiguous, we flag it — we don't resolve it for you.
Can't I just paste a deck into Claude?
You can. The gap is what happens after the paste.
1
Verification engine, not a conversation
Claude works with what you paste in. We run 90 expert perspectives that cross-check claims against public filings, registries, court records, and regulatory databases. When sources contradict the deck, you see both versions.
2
500x more information
A single verification burns ~100 million tokens across 1,000+ sources, 13 pipeline stages, and 70+ analysis agents simultaneously. Claude's context window is ~200K tokens, a 500x gap. Scale changes what you can find.
3
Full traceability
Different prompts, different output. We run the same pipeline every time — same checks, same adversarial review, same methodology. Every finding traces back to its source document through a full research graph. Click any claim and follow the chain.
Investment Committee-ready documents.
Every verification produces a structured, citation-backed report designed for your IC workflow. Share with co-investors, export to your firm's format, or use directly in partner meetings.
Report
Interactive Evidence Package
Browse findings by domain, expand any insight, drill into source evidence. Every claim linked to its origin document.
Report sections
Executive Brief Conflicting Information Risk Playbooks Opportunities Questions for Founders Full Deep Dive Sources Index Conclusion
Chat
Chat with Findings
Ask questions about any finding. Source-backed answers grounded in the evidence.
Evidence
Source-Linked
Every claim cited. Quotes, URLs, and confidence scores. One-click verification.
Audio
Audio Briefing
Listen on your commute
Export
PDF · JSON · CSV
Share with co-investors
IC Gating Checklist — ACME Inc Series A
Further investment consideration is contingent on:
- 1 Audited financials for FY2024-2025 to validate revenue, profitability, and capital efficiency claims
- 2 Formal legal opinion confirming regulatory exemption status for planned embedded finance workflows
- 3 Live demonstration of tested disaster recovery plan with documented RTO/RPO targets
- 4 Resolution of dual-entity corporate structure for primary OEM revenue contract
Not a vague "needs more diligence." A specific, enumerated list of what to verify and why — ready to hand to your legal team or share with co-investors.
Three steps
1
Upload your deck
Secure link. No back-and-forth. Processing begins immediately.
2
Verification runs in parallel
1,000+ sources. 13 verification stages. Every claim checked from financial, legal, regulatory, IP, competitive, and founder-credibility angles simultaneously. 4-6 hours.
3
Get IC-ready evidence
Conflicts, omissions, risks, opportunities, IC questions, gating checklist. All source-linked, all confidence-scored.
What we are (and aren't)
We surface evidence — risks and opportunities.
We don't make investment recommendations or score deals. Your judgment is the product; we provide the inputs.
Your judgment stays yours.
We automate the evidence gathering across specialized analytical perspectives. Your team owns evaluation, conviction, and the decision.
When data is thin, we say so.
The report is explicit about what's knowable and what isn't. No silence — a map of coverage gaps with confidence levels.
Your data stays isolated.
No model training on uploaded decks. Encrypted at rest and in transit. Full deletion on request.
Research platforms answer your questions. Document intelligence tools analyze what you already have. We do something different: we start with the deck and investigate the entire company — revenue, team, market, IP, risks, opportunities — against sources that weren't in the data room. That's the difference between research and verification.
Your pipeline is growing. Your diligence capacity is not.
See the output first.
Browse a completed verification on a real (anonymized) company — Executive Brief, Conflict Log, Source Chains, and linked sources.
Test it on your own deal.
Create a free account (takes 30 seconds), upload a deck where you already know the answer. See if we find what your team found — and what they missed.
A single missed conflict can cost your fund millions.