WaVe-X
Partner
"10x better than the analyst."
The output quality gave the team a faster starting point for evaluating claims across the deck.
Your pitch deck. Our evidence pipeline.
Upload a deck. Receive structured, source-backed verification across your diligence framework - in hours, not weeks. When the story doesn't match the public record, you see both versions with source links.
We automate the evidence pipeline, not the judgment.
Submit your pitch deck or investment memo. Processing begins immediately.
Full DD, financials only, team & founders, market & competition.
Typically 4-6 hours (full DD), under 2 hours (focused scope).
Or upload a pitch deck to start your verification
Real findings from a real verification. Conflicts, adversarial review, risk playbooks, and IC-ready questions — all source-linked.
Northstar's CTO joined from a staff engineer role at a mid-stage SaaS company and has not previously managed a team larger than four. The current engineering org is twelve people across three squads with plans to double by Q3. LinkedIn and reference calls confirm strong individual contribution but no evidence of scaled hiring, architecture review ownership, or incident-management leadership.
FinLedger, the closest competitor, closed a $40M Series B in November 2025 and announced SMB lending vertical expansion in their press release — directly overlapping with Northstar's core market. FinLedger has 3x the engineering team and existing bank partnerships that took 18 months to build.
Northstar reports strong logo retention, but product analytics show a median of roughly two monthly active users per customer organization. That is consistent with bookkeeping-only adoption in micro-SMBs and raises a founder question: is usage intentionally narrow, or is multi-seat expansion failing in the accounts that underpin the Series A story?
Or upload a pitch deck to start your verification
You can prompt Claude to analyze a pitch deck. Here's what it can't do:
Claude works with what you paste in. We pull actual filings from PACER, SEC EDGAR, state registries, and USPTO, score each by authority, recency, and independence, and show you all versions with confidence ratings when sources contradict the deck.
A single verification burns ~100 million tokens across 1,000+ sources, 13 pipeline stages, and 70+ analysis agents simultaneously. Claude's context window is ~200K tokens, a 500x gap.
Different prompts, different output. We run the same pipeline every time, same checks, same adversarial review, same methodology. Then you drill into any finding and go deeper from inside the platform.
Your criteria define what to verify, what counts as a risk, which sources matter, when to flag. Same engine, different outputs. The IP is yours.
Every verification produces a structured, citation-backed report designed for your IC workflow. Share with co-investors, export to your firm's format, or use directly in partner meetings.
Interactive Evidence Package
Browse findings by domain, expand any insight, drill into source evidence. Every claim linked to its origin document.
Report sections
Chat with Findings
Ask questions about any finding. Source-backed answers grounded in the evidence.
Source-Linked
Every claim cited. Quotes, URLs, and confidence scores. One-click verification.
Audio Briefing
Listen on your commute
PDF · JSON · CSV
Share with co-investors
Time per company
Manual Process
8-60+ hours
With Research.Tech
4-6 hours (full DD) + analyst review
Coverage
Manual Process
Selective deep dives on 25-30/year
With Research.Tech
Structured verification across your full pipeline
Source traceability
Manual Process
Trust the analyst's memory
With Research.Tech
Every field linked to its origin document
IC readiness
Manual Process
Analyst rewrites notes into memo
With Research.Tech
Gating checklist: specific items to verify before proceeding
Output
Manual Process
Unstructured notes
With Research.Tech
Structured evidence package with citations
Your Input
Pitch Deck
Claims & projections
Scope
Full DD or focused
Framework
Your diligence criteria
Priorities
What matters most
Verification Engine — 5 phases · 13 stages · 3 review cycles
Extraction
Research
Analysis
Adversarial Review
Assembly
0+
Agents
Multi-model cross-check
0+
Sources
100M+
Tokens per run
IC-Ready Evidence Package
Conflicts
Both sides, source-linked
Risk Playbooks
Assessment + mitigation
Gating Checklist
Items to verify pre-term sheet
Full Deep Dive
10 categories, all cited
Covers entities across all 50 US states + 8 international registries. Coverage depth varies by jurisdiction — gaps are explicitly flagged in the report.
Follow any claim back to its origin: from the research task, through every search and fetched page, down to exact text snippets and saved sources. Click any node to trace the full chain.
See the output first.
Browse a completed verification on a real (anonymized) company — Executive Brief, Conflict Log, Source Chains, and linked sources.
Test it on a closed deal.
Upload a deck where you already know the answer. See if we find what your team found — and what they missed.
Create an account to track your reports.